| Criterion | Individual | Team |
| Creative Ability | 30 | 25 |
| Scientific Thought and Engibneering Goals | 30 | 25 |
| Thoroughness | 15 | 12 |
| Skill | 15 | 12 |
| Clarity | 10 | 10 |
| Teamwork | - | 16 |
| TOTAL | 100 | 100 |
I. Creative Ability (Individual - 30, Team - 25)
1. Does the project show creative ability and originality in the questions asked?
- the approach to solving the problem?, the analysis of the data?, the interpretation of the data?
- the use of equipment?, the construction or design of new equipment?
2. Creative research should support an investigation and help answer a question in an original way.
3. A creative contribution promotes an efficient and reliable method for solving a problem. When evaluating projects, it is important to distinguish between gadgeteering and ingenuity.
II a. Scientific Thought (Individual - 30, Team - 25)
If an engineering project, the more appropriate questions are those found in IIb. Engineering Goals.
- Is the problem stated clearly and unambiguously?
- Was the problem sufficiently limited to allow plausible approach? Good scientists can identify important problems capable of solutions.
- Was there a procedural plan for obtaining a solution?
- Are the variables clearly recognized and defined?
- If controls were necessary, did the student recognize their need and were they correctly used?
- Are there adequate data to support the conclusions?
- Does the finalist or team recognize the data’s limitations?
- Does the finalist/team understand the project’s ties to related research?
- Does the finalist/team have an idea of what further research is warranted?
- Did the finalist/team cite scientific literature, or only popular literature (i.e., local newspapers, Reader’s Digest).
II b. Engineering Goals (Individual - 30, Team -25)
- Does the project have a clear objective?
- Is the objective relevant to the potential user’s needs?
- Is the solution workable? Acceptable to the potential user? Economically feasible?
- Could the solution be utilized successfully in design or construction of an end product?
- Is the solution a significant improvement over previous alternatives?
- Has the solution been tested for performance under the conditions of use?
III. Thoroughness (Individual - 15, Team - 12)
- Was the purpose carried out to completion within the scope of the original intent?
- How completely was the problem covered?
- Are the conclusions based on a single experiment or replication?
- How complete are the project notes?
- Is the finalist/team aware of other approaches or theories?
- How much time did the finalist or team spend on the project?
- Is the finalist/team familiar with scientific literature in the studied field?
IV. Skill (Individual - 15, Team - 12)
- Does the finalist/team have the required laboratory, computation, observational and design skills to obtain supporting data?
- Where was the project performed? (i.e., home, school laboratory, university laboratory) Did the student or team receive assistance from parents, teachers, scientists or engineers?
- Was the project completed under adult supervision, or did the student/team work largely alone?
- Where did the equipment come from? Was it built independently by the finalist or team? Was it obtained on loan? Was it part of a laboratory where the finalist or team worked?
V. Clarity (Individual - 10, Team - 10)
- How clearly does the finalist discuss his/her project and explain the purpose, procedure, and conclusions? Watch out for memorized speeches that reflect little understanding of principles.
- Does the written material reflect the finalist’s or team’s understanding of the research?
- Are the important phases of the project presented in an orderly manner?
- How clearly is the data presented?
- How clearly are the results presented?
- How well does the project display explain the project?
- Was the presentation done in a forthright manner, without tricks or gadgets?
- Did the finalist/team perform all the project work, or did someone help?
VI. Teamwork (Team Projects only- 16)
- Are the tasks and contributions of each team member clearly outlined?
- Was each team member fully involved with the project, and is each member familiar with all aspects?
- Does the final work reflect the coordinated efforts of all team members?